1. work in progress report
check: themes, and strong concepts
example : interaction Tarot
2. Framing design
Framing design in the Third Paradigm
Reference:
The Three Paradigms of HCI
2014年11月24日 星期一
2014年11月17日 星期一
week 9. strong concepts
1. work-in-progress report of cultural probes
2. Strong concepts
1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.
2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.
(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction
Guidelines for Design Process:
1. Interpret your data with rich interpretation, inspiration, imagination, and discourse.
2. Specify several "themes" related to the above interpretation.
3. Build "strong concepts" (in terms of 4 constructs) to meet these themes
4. Give form to these strong concepts, such as mood boards, and cards.
5. Discuss possible expressions (如何用 expression 開展設計) for your design based on these strong concepts
2. Strong concepts
1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.
2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.
(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction
Guidelines for Design Process:
1. Interpret your data with rich interpretation, inspiration, imagination, and discourse.
2. Specify several "themes" related to the above interpretation.
3. Build "strong concepts" (in terms of 4 constructs) to meet these themes
4. Give form to these strong concepts, such as mood boards, and cards.
5. Discuss possible expressions (如何用 expression 開展設計) for your design based on these strong concepts
2014年11月10日 星期一
week 8. probology
1. students present "probes" of ACM SDC themes
review "How HCI Interprets the Probes":
2. Probology:
(1) identify probes
(2) urban probes
(3) domestic probes
(4) value probes
(5) empathy probes
(6) mobile probes
(7) digital cultural probes
(8) cognitive probes
(9) technology probes
3. original probes features v.s. x-probes
epistemology-> methodology -> methods
review "How HCI Interprets the Probes":
2. Probology:
(1) identify probes
(2) urban probes
(3) domestic probes
(4) value probes
(5) empathy probes
(6) mobile probes
(7) digital cultural probes
(8) cognitive probes
(9) technology probes
3. original probes features v.s. x-probes
epistemology-> methodology -> methods
2014年11月3日 星期一
week 7. interpreting the probes
1. student present
Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1077-1086.
2.
Interpret you probes: (next week)
presentation on the interpretation of your probes,
Nov. 11, 2014.
Introducing "Strong Concepts"
1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.
2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.
2014年10月27日 星期一
week 6. design probes
1. student presentations on "design probes for ACM SDC proposal"
2.
discussion on design probes
Making Design Probes Work
Reference:
1. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17-24.
2. Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1077-1086.
(student present next week)
3. Eric Paulos and Chris Beckmann. 2006. Sashay: designing for wonderment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 881-884.
2.
discussion on design probes
Making Design Probes Work
Reference:
1. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17-24.
2. Kirsten Boehner, Janet Vertesi, Phoebe Sengers, and Paul Dourish. 2007. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1077-1086.
(student present next week)
3. Eric Paulos and Chris Beckmann. 2006. Sashay: designing for wonderment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), Rebecca Grinter, Thomas Rodden, Paul Aoki, Ed Cutrell, Robin Jeffries, and Gary Olson (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 881-884.
2014年10月20日 星期一
week 5. case study: Affective Diary
1. Student presentation on "living with data" investigation
Questions:
1. what does "living with data" mean? How are data related to "quality of life"?
2. What activities would users have regarding data? bodily perceive, emotionally respond, culturally interpret, self reflect, change behavior, ...
3. How could data embody in the life world?
4. Why is keeping diary related to well being? (http://affordanything.com/2012/03/16/change-your-life-in-less-than-one-minute/)
2. Case study on Affective Diary
Experiencing the Affective Diary
Questions:
1. what does "living with data" mean? How are data related to "quality of life"?
2. What activities would users have regarding data? bodily perceive, emotionally respond, culturally interpret, self reflect, change behavior, ...
3. How could data embody in the life world?
4. Why is keeping diary related to well being? (http://affordanything.com/2012/03/16/change-your-life-in-less-than-one-minute/)
2. Case study on Affective Diary
Experiencing the Affective Diary
2014年10月13日 星期一
week 4. ACM SDC & observation methods
1. Student presentation on ACM SDC issue: "Crossing"
2. Introducing Observation Methods
Questions:
1. What is Observation in Design Process?
2. What observation methods are there?
3. What is the method of Cultural Probes?
4. How to design Cultural Probes ?
5. How to collect/analyse/interpret data?
For ACM SDC, present your Design Probes (toolkit and data returned if possible) and your interpretation (or intention for possible return).
presentation date Oct. 28, 2014.
Observation and Ideation (Smart Things)
Reference papers:
1. Design: Cultural Probes
2. Making Design Probes Work
2. Introducing Observation Methods
Questions:
1. What is Observation in Design Process?
2. What observation methods are there?
3. What is the method of Cultural Probes?
4. How to design Cultural Probes ?
5. How to collect/analyse/interpret data?
For ACM SDC, present your Design Probes (toolkit and data returned if possible) and your interpretation (or intention for possible return).
presentation date Oct. 28, 2014.
Observation and Ideation (Smart Things)
Reference papers:
1. Design: Cultural Probes
2. Making Design Probes Work
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)