week 15. project discussion & writing guides

 final project deadline Dec. 19, 2022

in ACM CHI Publication Formats

project report submitted to  (Deadline Jan. 19, 2023)
ACM CHI 2023, Late-Breaking Work


other submissions:
ACM DIS 2023 pictorial or full paper (Feb. 2, 2023)

Example:

A World Following Farmer Almanac

Expected-Experience Entanglements
Confabulation Radio
Craft consciousness

1. students present work in progress

2. 寫作工具書:

英文研究論文寫作：關鍵句指引（第四版）廖柏森

英文研究論文寫作：段落指引（第二版）廖柏森

3. 英文工具網站:

(1)  段落範例句: http://www.ref-n-write.com/trial/how-to-write-a-research-paper-academic-phrasebank-vocabulary/

 

(2) 學術字列表 Academic Word List (AWL):

    https://www.eapfoundation.com/vocab/academic/awllists/

(3) 搭配詞 句酷

      http://www.jukuu.com/

week 14. project discussion

 project progress report

week 13. designing frames of interactive things

1. students present progress report of final project

2. framing interactive things:

    embodiment, metaphor, agency, perceptual crossing
2.

Understanding expressions of internet of things from Rung-Huei Liang



3.
能動性 (agency)

知覺交錯模型下的物件能動性.pdf (見FB 社團)


Exercise:
Design your artifacts with the above two frameworks.

Ref:

Rung-Huei Liang. 2015. Forms and Expressions of Internet of Things.　第一屆科技藝術國際學術研討會(ISAT 2015), Jan 10- 11, Taipei, Taiwan.

Leila Takayama. 2012. Perspectives onagency interacting with and through personal robots. In Human-Computer Interaction: The AgencyPerspective (pp. 195-214). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

week 12. phenomenology & ethnography

First :
 Things making Things: An Ethnography of the Impossible


What is ethnography ?
What is phenomenology?
How do they relate to design?


1.

Ethnographic vs Phenomenological Research Designs

2. Qualitative methodologies: ethnography, phenomenology, grounded theory and more

3. very short introduction:

Notes on Ethnography and Design

4. Blomberg et al. 經典:
An Ethnographic Approach to Design

5. Ethnographic Data Analysis:
     http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~irene/l17-ethnography_analysis.pdf


Question:
1. how to apply ethnography (/phenomenology) to "cultural probes", how to apply ethnography (/phenomenology) to the study of design artifacts?

2. when to use ethnography? when to use phenomenology?

week 11. framing design

1. work in progress report

   check: themes, and strong concepts

   example : interaction Tarot
   https://interactiontarot.wordpress.com/

   

2. Framing design

Framing design in the Third Paradigm

Reference:
The Three Paradigms of HCI

Interaction Tarot: A Card-BasedDesign of Knowledge Construction for Brainstorming in HCI.

Poetics of Future Work: Blending Speculative Design withArtistic Methodology

week 10. strong concepts

1. work-in-progress report of cultural probes


2. Strong concepts

1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.

2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.

(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction

4.

Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research

Somaesthetic Appreciation Design (CHI15)

Guidelines for Design Process:
1. Interpret your data with rich interpretation, inspiration, imagination, and discourse.
2. Specify several "themes" related to the above interpretation.
3. Build "strong concepts" (in terms of 4 constructs) to meet these themes
4. Give form to these strong concepts, such as mood boards, and cards.
5. Discuss possible expressions (如何用 expression 開展設計) for your design based on these strong concepts

week 9. probe discussion

1. students (in group) present probe toolkits

2. more detail examples in
 

Making design probes work

Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life (DIS 18)

Evaluation Probes

Perspective probe: many parts add up to a whole perspective

Medium probes: exploring the medium not the message

See you on the subway: exploring mobile social software

Vulnerability of displacement: challenges for integrating refugees and asylum seekers in host communities

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

3. preparing exercises in
   https://calmtech.com/exercises.html

[progress report]

Data collection report of  probes in final project Nov. 14th

week 8. probology

1. students present Cultural Probes for each team
2. 

Cultural probes from Rung-Huei Liang

3. introducing
"How HCI Interprets the Probes":

2. X-Probes:
(1) identify probes
(2) urban probes
(3) domestic probes
(4) value probes
(5) empathy probes
(6) mobile probes
(7) digital cultural probes
(8) cognitive probes
(9) technology probes

3. original probes features v.s. x-probes

epistemology-> methodology -> methods
epistemology->probology->probes


References

Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty

Interpreting the Probes for final project, each team:
1. write down your own probology rules (or beliefs)
2. redesign your probes with various media and methods, according to your probology
3. collect probing data
4. interpret the data, seek the meanings, and perhaps the underlying intentionality behind phenomena.

Deadlines: Nov. 14, 2022.

week 7. probes as methods

1. Students present "EX2: living with data"

References:
Gaver: Design: Cultural Probes, 1999
Wallace: How Design Probes Work, 2013

Recent cases:

Pop-Up Probes: Using Pop-up Paper Elements for Cultural Probes to Understand Domestic Routines (MuC '22)

How Design Researchers Interpret Probes: Understanding the Critical Intentions of a Designerly Approach to Research (CHI'21)

Tricky Design Probes: Triggering Reflection on Design Research Methods in Service Design (DIS'20)

Towards a Probe Design Framework (OZCHI'19)

more detail examples in

Probe Tools (Task Cam)

TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies (CHI18)

Making design probes work

Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life (DIS 18) (Diversifying the Domestic: A Design Inquiry into Collective and Mobile Living, DIS19)

Designing Memory Probes to Inform Dialogue (DIS18)

Share on

Evaluation Probes

Perspective probe: many parts add up to a whole perspective

Medium probes: exploring the medium not the message

Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres (CHI05)

See you on the subway: exploring mobile social software

Vulnerability of displacement: challenges for integrating refugees and asylum seekers in host communities

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

Researching sensitive topics: Adjusting cultural probes to research and identify design spaces for sensitive HCI.

situated visualization & co-speculation

Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design (DIS19)

Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation (DIS19)

Botanical Printer: An Exploration on Interaction Design with Plantness (DIS18)

Exploring The Future of Data-Driven Product Design (CHI20)

IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New Encounters (CHI20)

student example:

A World Following Farmer Almanac

Expected-Experience Entanglements
Confabulation Radio
Craft consciousness

Report:

1.  Each student present one type of probes in "How HCI Interprets the Probes" 

  (Oct 24, 2022)

2. Final project progress report (Oct 24, 2022)

week 5. presentation & discussion

1. Students present proposals for ACM submission.

2. EX2: Living with data  (10/17)

             auto-ethnography method

Questions:
1. How do we live with data?
2. How do we perceive (feel) the data we live with?
3. What is the form of data to live with?
4. How are the correlation of different data?

EX2: living with data

Conduct an activity to answer the above questions.
Presentation date: Oct. 3, 2022. Oct. 17, 2022

References:

Paul Dourish and Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2018. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society 5, 2 (2018). 

Felix Heibeck, Alexis Hope, and Julie Legault. 2014. Sensory Fiction: A Design Fiction of Emotional Computation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (ImmersiveMe '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660579.2660585

3. short introduction to "back to the real world"   

week 4. back to the real world

 1. students present "Broken IT Probes"

Questions:

1. What is the meaning when IT products break?

2. Why people keep broken IT products?

References:

Broken probes: toward the design of worn media

Droog: Do Break

2. VR vs. AR

VR:  Sutherland, I. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings FJCC 1968, Thompson Books, Washington, DC, 1968

Mark Weiser, Computer for the 21st Century, 1991

Communications of the ACM Volume 36, Issue 7July 1993Special issue on computer augmented environments: back to the real world

    

            Back to the real world

        

            Knowledge-based augmented reality

            Environmental technology: making the real world virtual

Milgram, Paul; H. Takemura; A. Utsumi; F. Kishino (1994). "Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum" . Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. pp. 2351–34.

Mark Weiser, Designing Calm Technology, 1995

Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms, CHI'97

Magical Realist Design, DIS 2020

week 3. ubiquitous computing and calm technology

1. Broken IT probes 
reference frames: object -> practice -> meanings
reference theory: activity theory (on interaction design org)

reference book: Understanding Media by McLuhan (麥克魯漢， 認識媒體)
1, 媒體四大律:
增強?削弱?重拾?轉化?
(參考"數位麥克魯漢")
2. hot media vs. cool media (熱媒體 vs. 冷媒體)

3. rear-view mirror (後視鏡理論現象)

4. The medium is the message (媒體即訊息)

5. Understanding media: the extension of man (媒體: 人的延伸)

Thing ethnography?

Thing Constellation?

(The co-occurrence of things) 

Elisa Giaccardi, Nazli Cila, Chris Speed, and Melissa Caldwell. 2016. Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901905

Yu-Ting Cheng, Mathias Funk, Wenn-Chieh Tsai, and Lin-Lin Chen. 2019. Peekaboo Cam: Designing an Observational Camera for Home Ecologies Concerning Privacy. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323699

Yi-Ching (Janet) Huang, Yu-Ting Cheng, Rung-Huei Liang, Jane Yung-jen Hsu, and Lin-Lin Chen. 2021. Thing Constellation Visualizer: Exploring Emergent Relationships of Everyday Objects. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 479 (October 2021), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479866

2. Ubiquitous Computing / Calm Technology / Ambient Intelligence

Discussion on
Mark Weiser, Computer for the 21st Century
Mark Weiser, Designing Calm Technology

3. 

Questions:
1. How do we live with data?
2. How do we perceive (feel) the data we live with?
3. What is the form of data to live with?
4. How are the correlation of different data?

EX2: living with data

Conduct an activity to answer the above questions.
Presentation date: Oct. 3, 2022.

References:

Paul Dourish and Edgar Gómez Cruz. 2018. Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating with data. Big Data & Society 5, 2 (2018). 

Felix Heibeck, Alexis Hope, and Julie Legault. 2014. Sensory Fiction: A Design Fiction of Emotional Computation. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Immersive Media Experiences (ImmersiveMe '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660579.2660585

Case study:
Objects of Research

Ambient Devices (where is ambient orb or umbrella?)


Reference:
Ambient Intelligence
connected home product
Experiencing the Affective Diary
Reflecting on the design process of the Affective Diary

Enhancing ubiquitous computing with user interpretation: field testing the home health horoscope

week 2. self-introduction & IoT presentation

Suggested Presentation & critique guidelines:

1. BPMRC
    Background (problem, idea, gap)
    Purpose (better future, intended future)
    Method (framing, approach, tool)
    Result (outcome, expected output)
    Conclusion

2. MEFF
    Material (idea, problem, issue)
    Expression (metaphor, scenarios, emotion)
    Function  (task, path, technology)
    Form (representation, affordance)


Activities:

1. 自我介紹，專長，個人惡趣味。
2. Students Present IoT examples

https://www.postscapes.com/internet-of-things-examples/

3. ACM student design competition Kick-off presentation
    What is the plan for design?
    How do you frame your problem?
    Which method do you want to use?
    What approach? Theory driven? Example based? Fictional paper abstract?
    Probing Example:

     Designing Memory Probes to Inform Dialogue

      How Design Researchers Interpret Probes

 
    Next presentation: Sept. 19, 2022

   ACM Student Design Competition: (Deadline Jan. 19, 2023)

https://chi2023.acm.org/for-authors/student-design-competition/

ACM SIGCHI Late-Breaking Work: (Deadline Jan. 19, 2023)

https://chi2023.acm.org/for-authors/late-breaking-work/

DIS examples:

   DIS 2021 (Designing Interactive System)
   DIS pictorial example Botanic Printer

3. Discussion on Weiser's "The computer for 21st Century"

"The most profound technologies are those that disappear.

They weave themselves into the fabric of everyday life until

they are indistinguishable from it."

EX1: Broken IT probes (Sept. 26, 2022)
1. collect at least one "out-of-date" (old, worn) IT (information technology) product.
2. speculate with the object's viewpoint
3. complete a secrete-life diary of the object
上傳到Google drive (shown in FB community)

舊書修復:

week 1. introduction

1. 學生為主體的學習 (報告、討論、帶領工作坊、參與競賽)
    Students as learning subjects (report, discussion, workshop holding, competition)

2. 自主學習設計方法、設計工具、設計流程。
    self learning design methods, design tools, design process

3. 自行蒐集設計資料、定義問題、製作設計工具。
    self collecting data, framing problems, making design tool

4. 自行訂定設計評估方法，使用者調查方法。
    self designing evaluation methods, user study methods

學習內容:

1. 互動設計領域重要論文研讀 (Ubi-comp, Tangible interaction, Calm tech, / Slow tech, critical/reflective/ludic/speculative design, material interaction)

2. 互動設計研究方法學 (probology, research through design, / dialogical meaning-making, phenomenology)

3. 互動設計個案實作 (SIGCHI/DIS submission)

個人報告  (Sept. 12, /2022)
1. 自我介紹 (self-intro)
2. 惡趣味介紹 (complicated pleasure sharing)

3. 智慧型設計分享 (https://www.postscapes.com/internet-of-things-examples/) 五組擇一分享。

競賽相關
1. 組隊 (2-5 人/隊)
2. 報告比賽規則, Q&A, discussion (Sept. 12, 2022)

期末: (final)

 組隊投稿 ACM 學生設計競賽/SIGCHI  Late-Breaking Work。
 Team up to participate ACM Student Design Competition or SIGCHI Late-Breaking Work.

ACM Student Design Competition: (Deadline Jan. 19, 2023)

https://chi2023.acm.org/for-authors/student-design-competition/

ACM SIGCHI Late-Breaking Work: (Deadline Jan. 19, 2023)

https://chi2023.acm.org/for-authors/late-breaking-work/

Example:

A World Following Farmer Almanac

Expected-Experience Entanglements
Confabulation Radio
Craft consciousness
footpal team 2010
paper
BlindNavi 2015

Readings:
Mark Weiser, Computer for the 21st Century

評分方式: (Grading)
1. 個人表現 60% + 團隊表現 40 %
    Personal performance 60% + Team performance 40 %

2. 評分項目: 課堂出席、參與討論﹐、互相評論、競賽作品完整度。
    Evaluation items: course participation, discussion, critique, completeness of ACM competition