week 10. strong concepts

1. work-in-progress report of cultural probes


2. Strong concepts

1. Jonas Löwgren. 2013. Annotated portfolios and other forms of intermediate-level knowledge.interactions 20, 1 (January 2013), 30-34.

2. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012), 18 pages.

(pp. 23:11- 23:13)
4 constructs:
1. contextual grounding
2. horizontal grounding
3. vertical grounding
4. reflection, articulation, and abstraction

4.

Between theory and practice: bridging concepts in HCI research

Guidelines for Design Process:
1. Interpret your data with rich interpretation, inspiration, imagination, and discourse.
2. Specify several "themes" related to the above interpretation.
3. Build "strong concepts" (in terms of 4 constructs) to meet these themes
4. Give form to these strong concepts, such as mood boards, and cards.
5. Discuss possible expressions (如何用 expression 開展設計) for your design based on these strong concepts

week 9. probe discussion & calm tech

1. students present work-in-progress of cultural probes

Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty

2. more detail examples in
 

Making design probes work

Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life (DIS 18)

Evaluation Probes

Perspective probe: many parts add up to a whole perspective

Medium probes: exploring the medium not the message

See you on the subway: exploring mobile social software

Vulnerability of displacement: challenges for integrating refugees and asylum seekers in host communities

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

3. 

 calm technology and calmness

Designing calm technology and peripheral interaction for offshore service vessels

Probing calmness in applications using a calm display prototype

4. preparing exercises in (deadline 11/23)
   https://calmtech.com/exercises.html

week 8. probe discussion

1. students present x-probe examples

2. students present probe and probing insights
3. more detail examples in
 

Making design probes work

Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life (DIS 18)

Evaluation Probes

Perspective probe: many parts add up to a whole perspective

Medium probes: exploring the medium not the message

See you on the subway: exploring mobile social software

Vulnerability of displacement: challenges for integrating refugees and asylum seekers in host communities

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

4. preparing exercises in
   https://calmtech.com/exercises.html

week 7. probology

1. students present Cultural Probes for each team
2. 

Cultural probes from Rung-Huei Liang

3. introducing
"How HCI Interprets the Probes":

2. X-Probes:
(1) identify probes
(2) urban probes
(3) domestic probes
(4) value probes
(5) empathy probes
(6) mobile probes
(7) digital cultural probes
(8) cognitive probes
(9) technology probes

3. original probes features v.s. x-probes

epistemology-> methodology -> methods
epistemology->probology->probes


References

Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty

Interpreting the Probes for final project, each team:
1. write down your own probology rules (or beliefs)
2. redesign your probes with various media and methods, according to your probology
3. collect probing data
4. interpret the data, seek the meanings, and perhaps the underlying intentionality behind phenomena.

Deadlines: Nov. 16, 2020.

week 6. probes as methods

References:
Gaver: Design: Cultural Probes, 1999
Wallace: How Design Probes Work, 2013

more detail examples in

Probe Tools (Task Cam)

TaskCam: Designing and Testing an Open Tool for Cultural Probes Studies (CHI18)

Making design probes work

Designing for an other Home: Expanding and Speculating on Different Forms of Domestic Life (DIS 18) (Diversifying the Domestic: A Design Inquiry into Collective and Mobile Living, DIS19)

Designing Memory Probes to Inform Dialogue (DIS18)

Share on

Evaluation Probes

Perspective probe: many parts add up to a whole perspective

Medium probes: exploring the medium not the message

Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres (CHI05)

See you on the subway: exploring mobile social software

Vulnerability of displacement: challenges for integrating refugees and asylum seekers in host communities

Making history: intentional capture of future memories

Researching sensitive topics: Adjusting cultural probes to research and identify design spaces for sensitive HCI.

Healthcare gamification Serious game about COVID-19 

Design in Quarantine

situated visualization & co-speculation

Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design (DIS19)

Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation (DIS19)

Botanical Printer: An Exploration on Interaction Design with Plantness (DIS18)

Exploring The Future of Data-Driven Product Design (CHI20)

IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New Encounters (CHI20)

student example:

A World Following Farmer Almanac

Expected-Experience Entanglements
Confabulation Radio
Craft consciousness

Report:

  Each student present at least 5 interesting designs in Quarantine 

  (Oct 26, 2020)

week 5. discussion on BTTRW

 1. students present "living with data"

  Questions:

   (1) How do we frame data as something else?  

        for example, data as bio standard, data as living guideline, data as meaning-making, data as self representation, data as symbol, data as index

        how about data as food for home devices?

Data Hungry Home:

The Data Hungry Home

The Data Hungry Home: Humans Harvesting Data for Living Devices

 data as agencies  "beyond human-centred design" 

  (2) simple data vs. complex form?

   (3) perceptual & cognitive aspects of data

  (4) experiential quality of data (experiential data)

2. discussion on Back to the Real World

Final Project Probes (World of No Return):

Worlds before and after COVID-19,  quarantine. social distance, ...

What is the design challenges and chances in the world of no return.

What passed? What emerge? What wait for designing?

1. Design you Probe Package (deadline 2020/10/26)
    Shoot all your package elements in row and column, upload to google drive.
2. Conduct Probing
3. Interview and Report (Deadline 2020/11/2)

week 4. back to the real world

 1. students present "Broken IT Probes"

Questions:

1. What is the meaning when IT products break?

2. Why people keep broken IT products?

References:

Broken probes: toward the design of worn media

2. VR vs. AR

VR:  Sutherland, I. A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings FJCC 1968, Thompson Books, Washington, DC, 1968

Mark Weiser, Computer for the 21st Century, 1991

Communications of the ACM Volume 36, Issue 7July 1993Special issue on computer augmented environments: back to the real world

    

            Back to the real world

        

            Knowledge-based augmented reality

            Environmental technology: making the real world virtual

Milgram, Paul; H. Takemura; A. Utsumi; F. Kishino (1994). "Augmented Reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum" . Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. pp. 2351–34.

Mark Weiser, Designing Calm Technology, 1995

Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms, CHI'97

Magical Realist Design, DIS 2020